[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aOU6dEEedEnK5ZTk@yury>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 12:06:12 -0400
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, dakr@...nel.org,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>,
joel@...lfernandes.org, Elle Rhumsaa <elle@...thered-steel.dev>,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Introduce bitfield and move register macro to
rust/kernel/
On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 10:20:54PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue Oct 7, 2025 at 7:42 PM JST, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:36 PM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> We can assume maintainership of this of course, but is there a problem
> >> if this falls under the core Rust umbrella? As this is a pretty core
> >> functionality. Miguel and other core folks, WDYT?
> >
> > I think what Yury may mean is that this should get an explicit
> > `MAINTAINERS` subentry even if it falls under `rust/kernel/` -- I
> > agree that is a good idea.
Exactly. Otherwise we'll end up with a single maintainer for a huge
codebase written by different people for different reasons. This is how
lib/ is maintained now. Not very effective.
> Ack - how do you expect things to work in terms of code flow? Do we need
> to have a dedicated tree and send you pull requests? If so, should we
> host it under the Rust-for-Linux Github org?
(Not sure you've asked me but anyways)
For maintenance hierarchy I'd suggest a structure where an author of
the new subsystem obviously becomes a maintainer, then some acknowledged
Rust person co-maintains it, and lately some non-rust person from a
related kernel subsystem becomes a reviewer or co-maintainer.
In 6.18 we did this for bitmaps, and the maintenance entry looks like:
BITMAP API [RUST]
M: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
M: Burak Emir <bqe@...gle.com>
R: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
S: Maintained
F: rust/kernel/bitmap.rs
Check 11eca92a2cae ("rust: add bitmap API").
Thanks,
Yury
Powered by blists - more mailing lists