[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cbd56835c1b8dc2609019193d896d3f0ec7346ad.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 13:23:08 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, syzbot
<syzbot+afec6555eef563c66c97@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
kas@...nel.org, kevin.brodsky@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
luto@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rppt@...nel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de, wei.liu@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org, yu-cheng.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: fix overflow in __cpa_addr
On Mon, 2025-10-06 at 15:22 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/5/25 20:48, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
> > Cc: stable@...nel.org
> > Reported-by: syzbot+afec6555eef563c66c97@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Fixes: 86e6815b316e ("x86/mm: Change cpa_flush() to call
> > flush_kernel_range() directly")
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Thanks for the quick fix here!
>
> But this doesn't need to go to stable, right? I think it just went to
> Linus during the merge window last week so it never made it to a
> release, so won't need a stable backport.
>
Oh good point.
I had totally lost track of when the problem
was merged upstream in the first place.
--
All Rights Reversed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists