linux-kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee87c8c2-eaa2-4fb2-98b6-1da0cabee056@sch.bme.hu>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 22:46:20 +0200
From: Bence Csókás <bence98@....bme.hu>
To: Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>,
 Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>, g@...1.home
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>, Bence Csókás
 <bence98@....bme.hu>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re:

Hi,

> On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 04:21:50PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> 
> Hello Dharma,
> 
>> Mark the interrupt as IRQF_SHARED to permit multiple counter channels to
>> share the same TCB IRQ line.
>>
>> Each Timer/Counter Block (TCB) instance shares a single IRQ line among its
>> three internal channels. When multiple counter channels (e.g., counter@0
>> and counter@1) within the same TCB are enabled, the second call to
>> devm_request_irq() fails because the IRQ line is already requested by the
>> first channel.
>>
>> Fixes: e5d581396821 ("counter: microchip-tcb-capture: Add IRQ handling")
>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/counter/microchip-tcb-capture.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/counter/microchip-tcb-capture.c b/drivers/counter/microchip-tcb-capture.c
>> index 1a299d1f350b..19d457ae4c3b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/counter/microchip-tcb-capture.c
>> +++ b/drivers/counter/microchip-tcb-capture.c
>> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static void mchp_tc_irq_remove(void *ptr)
>>   static int mchp_tc_irq_enable(struct counter_device *const counter, int irq)
>>   {
>>   	struct mchp_tc_data *const priv = counter_priv(counter);
>> -	int ret = devm_request_irq(counter->parent, irq, mchp_tc_isr, 0,
>> +	int ret = devm_request_irq(counter->parent, irq, mchp_tc_isr, IRQF_SHARED,
>>   				   dev_name(counter->parent), counter);
>>
>>   	if (ret < 0)
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: fd94619c43360eb44d28bd3ef326a4f85c600a07
>> change-id: 20251006-microchip-tcb-edd8aeae36c4
>>
> 
> This change makes sense, thanks !
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>
> 
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>
>>
> 
> --
> Kamel Bouhara, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com

Looks reasonable to me as well.

Reviewed-by: Bence Csókás <bence98@....bme.hu>