linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] ASoC: wm8978: add missing BCLK divider setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAN7C2SApVuEBTpq-E=bT=1yS+hQVv4J6FSe4ACa5_1a7pSprkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 05:27:58 +0800
From: Sune Brian <briansune@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ASoC: wm8978: add missing BCLK divider setup

Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> 於 2025年10月9日 週四 上午4:26寫道：

> Another one I've seen is that you're using the BCLK as the MCLK for
> another part (a few devices even require this), you might want to run
> BCLK at 256fs or whatever for the MCLK even though it's not needed for
> when used as BCLK.

If you need BCLK as MCLK same clock rate why you need to use BCLK from
first place?