linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 mm-new 03/11] mm: thp: add support for BPF based THP order selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQKLbc4iZDGWbbhqwr8hKhAZhyLjiZuuz_RBd2f9LH45rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 21:39:08 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, ziy@...dia.com, 
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, 
	Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, npache@...hat.com, ryan.roberts@....com, 
	dev.jain@....com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, usamaarif642@...il.com, 
	gutierrez.asier@...wei-partners.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, 
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>, 
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 21cnbao@...il.com, 
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, lance.yang@...ux.dev, 
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 mm-new 03/11] mm: thp: add support for BPF based THP
 order selection

On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:25 PM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 12:10 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:51 PM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:25 AM Alexei Starovoitov
> > > <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 1:47 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > has shown that multiple attachments often introduce conflicts. This is
> > > > > precisely why system administrators prefer to manage BPF programs with
> > > > > a single manager—to avoid undefined behaviors from competing programs.
> > > >
> > > > I don't believe this a single bit.
> > >
> > > You should spend some time seeing how users are actually applying BPF
> > > in practice. Some information for you :
> > >
> > > https://github.com/bpfman/bpfman
> > > https://github.com/DataDog/ebpf-manager
> > > https://github.com/ccfos/huatuo
> >
> > By seeing the above you learned the wrong lesson.
> > These orchestrators and many others were created because
> > we made mistakes in the kernel by not scoping the progs enough.
> > XDP is a prime example. It allows one program per netdev.
> > This was a massive mistake which we're still trying to fix.
>
> Since we don't use XDP in production, I can't comment on it. However,
> for our multi-attachable cgroup BPF programs, a key issue arises: if a
> program has permission to attach to one cgroup, it can attach to any
> cgroup. While scoping enables attachment to individual cgroups, it
> does not enforce isolation. This means we must still check for
> conflicts between programs, which begs the question: what is the
> functional purpose of this scoping mechanism?

cgroup mprog was added to remove the need for an orchestrator.

> My position is that the only valid scope for bpf-thp is at the level
> of specific THP modes like madvise and always. This patch correctly
> implements that precise design.

I'm done with this thread.

Nacked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>