[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a5ce076-632c-4d58-bb43-c31f41ab06a5@wdc.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 06:16:11 +0000
From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
To: hch <hch@....de>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami
Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, "linux-block@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org>, John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, Hannes
Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Naohiro Aota
<Naohiro.Aota@....com>, Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>, "Martin K . Petersen"
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/15] blktrace: add block trace commands for zone
operations
On 10/8/25 8:14 AM, hch wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 01:08:00PM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> Sure for the old commands everything is still in the lower 32bits, this
>> has the nice property that we don't need to duplicate all the code for
>> v1 and v2.
> I don't think you need to duplicate anything, just have a little
> function that maps from the free-form v2 commands and flags to the
> v1 field. Preferably including a mapping of all unsupported ones to
> a catchall unsupported command and flag each to indicate that the
> trace includes something only visible with v2.
I see your point, let me cook something.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists