[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025100822-bobble-basics-137c@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 12:34:27 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Akiyoshi Kurita <weibu@...admin.org>
Cc: florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
umang.jain@...asonboard.com, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: mmal-vchiq: fix typo in comment
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 01:36:17PM +0900, Akiyoshi Kurita wrote:
> servie → service
>
> Signed-off-by: Akiyoshi Kurita <weibu@...admin.org>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c
> index 3fe482bd2793..c2b5a37915f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c
> @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static int bulk_receive(struct vchiq_mmal_instance *instance,
> * committed a buffer_to_host operation to the mmal
> * port without the buffer to back it up (underflow
> * handling) and there is no obvious way to deal with
> - * this - how is the mmal servie going to react when
> + * this - how is the mmal service going to react when
> * we fail to do the xfer and reschedule a buffer when
> * it arrives? perhaps a starved flag to indicate a
> * waiting bulk receive?
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
Does not apply to the tree :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists