[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aOZj4Jeif1uYXAxZ@google.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 13:15:12 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Acs <acsjakub@...zon.de>
Cc: djwong@...nel.org, jhubbard@...dia.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev, david@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, peterx@...hat.com, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
xu.xin16@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: use enum for vm_flags
On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 12:54:27PM +0000, Jakub Acs wrote:
> redefine VM_* flag constants with BIT()
>
> Make VM_* flag constant definitions consistent - unify all to use BIT()
> macro and define them within an enum.
>
> The bindgen tool is better able to handle BIT(_) declarations when used
> in an enum.
>
> Also add enum definitions for tracepoints.
>
> We have previously changed VM_MERGEABLE in a separate bugfix. This is a
> follow-up to make all the VM_* flag constant definitions consistent, as
> suggested by David in [1].
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/85f852f9-8577-4230-adc7-c52e7f479454@redhat.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Acs <acsjakub@...zon.de>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Xu Xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>
> Cc: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>
> Hi Alice,
>
> thanks for the patch, I squashed it in (should I add your signed-off-by
> too?) and added the TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM calls pointed out by Derrick.
You could add this if you go with the enum approach:
Co-Developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> I have the following points to still address, though:
>
> - can the fact that we're not controlling the type of the values if
> using enum be a problem? (likely the indirect control we have through
> the highest value is good enough, but I'm not sure)
The compiler should pick the right integer type in this case.
> - where do TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM calls belong?
> I see them placed e.g. in include/trace/misc/nfs.h for nfs or
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h, but I don't see a corresponding file for
> mm.h - does this warrant creating a separate file for these
> definitions?
>
> - with the need for TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM calls, do we still deem this
> to be a good trade-off? - isn't fixing all of these in
> rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h better?
>
> @Derrick, can you point me to how to test for the issue you pointed out?
I'm not familiar with the TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM unfortunately.
> +#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
> +TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(VM_MAYOVERLAY);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
Here I think you want:
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(VM_UFFD_MISSING);
#else
TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(VM_MAYOVERLAY);
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
> +TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(VM_SOFTDIRTY);
Here I think you want:
#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(VM_SOFTDIRTY);
#endif
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists