[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xhsmhbjmhh52v.mognet@vschneid-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 15:54:16 +0200
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tj@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, longman@...hat.com, hannes@...xchg.org, mkoutny@...e.com,
void@...ifault.com, arighi@...dia.com, changwoo@...lia.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev, liuwenfang@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] sched: Cleanup the change-pattern and related
locking
On 06/10/25 12:44, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There here patches clean up the scheduler 'change' pattern and related locking
> some. They are the less controversial bit of some proposed sched_ext changes
> and stand on their own.
>
> I would like to queue them into sched/core after the merge window.
>
>
> Also in:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git sched/cleanup
>
Other than what's already been said, that LGTM. It's good to finally have a
canonical change pattern... pattern? :-)
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists