[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251008135526.GV4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 15:55:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] seqlock: introduce scoped_seqlock_read() and
scoped_seqlock_read_irqsave()
On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 03:13:02PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/08, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 02:30:14PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > Only 1/4 was changed according to comments from Linus and Waiman,
> > > but let me resend 2-4 as well.
> >
> > Shall I put this in tip/locking/core once -rc1 happens or so?
>
> Would be great ;) If nobody objects.
>
> Can you also take the trivial
>
> [PATCH 1/1] documentation: seqlock: fix the wrong documentation of read_seqbegin_or_lock/need_seqretry
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250928162029.GA3121@redhat.com/
>
> ?
I've picked that up too and stuck it in front.
> OTOH, if this series is merged, this doc fix should be updated to
> mention scoped_seqlock_read()...
I see a patch [5/4] in your future ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists