lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c064a20-15bc-4e7d-ab76-bdbcc2a2465c@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 17:15:10 +0200
From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...labora.com>
To: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
 Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 Gerald Loacker <gerald.loacker@...fvision.net>,
 Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
 Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
 <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
 Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
 Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
 Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
 Collabora Kernel Team <kernel@...labora.com>,
 Paul Kocialkowski <paulk@...-base.io>,
 Alexander Shiyan <eagle.alexander923@...il.com>,
 Val Packett <val@...kett.cool>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 08/13] media: rockchip: rkcif: add support for mipi
 csi-2 capture

Hi Mehdi,

On 8/19/25 18:46, Mehdi Djait wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I am seeing IOMMU page faults: See below.

Sorry for the late reply. I had to get a similar setup first. Now I have
a Radxa ROCK 3A and a Radxa Camera 8M (with the Sony IMX219 sensor,
should be 100% compatible to the RasPi Cam v2.1) on my table.

> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 01:26:00AM +0200, Michael Riesch via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...labora.com>
>>
>> The RK3568 Video Capture (VICAP) unit features a MIPI CSI-2 capture
>> interface that can receive video data and write it into system memory
>> using the ping-pong scheme. Add support for it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>
>> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...labora.com>
> 
> [..]
> 
>>  irqreturn_t rkcif_mipi_isr(int irq, void *ctx)
>>  {
>> +	struct device *dev = ctx;
>> +	struct rkcif_device *rkcif = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>  	irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
>> +	u32 intstat;
>> +
>> +	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < rkcif->match_data->mipi->mipi_num; i++) {
>> +		enum rkcif_interface_index index = RKCIF_MIPI_BASE + i;
>> +		struct rkcif_interface *interface = &rkcif->interfaces[index];
>> +
>> +		intstat = rkcif_mipi_read(interface, RKCIF_MIPI_INTSTAT);
>> +		rkcif_mipi_write(interface, RKCIF_MIPI_INTSTAT, intstat);
>> +
>> +		for (unsigned int j = 0; j < interface->streams_num; j++) {
>> +			struct rkcif_stream *stream = &interface->streams[j];
> 
> In the TRM you can see in the MIPI_INTSTAT interrupts to detect
> overflows: why not activate them ?
> 
> something like this:
> 
> #define RKCIF_MIPI_INT_Y_OVERFLOW(id)          BIT(16)
> #define RKCIF_MIPI_INT_UV_OVERFLOW(id)         BIT(17)
> #define RKCIF_MIPI_INT_FIFO_OVERFLOW(id)       BIT(18)
> #define RKCIF_MIPI_INT_CSI2RX_FIFO_OVERFLOW(id)        BIT(20)
> 
> and then OR them with the int_mask in rkcif_mipi_start_streaming()
> 
> and then you can log the err if something happened ?

I have not needed these interrupts yet. They can be added any time
whenever they are required. (Patches welcome :-))

>> +
>> +			if (intstat & RKCIF_MIPI_INT_FRAME0_END(stream->id) ||
>> +			    intstat & RKCIF_MIPI_INT_FRAME1_END(stream->id)) {
>> +				ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +
>> +				if (stream->stopping) {
>> +					rkcif_mipi_stop_streaming(stream);
>> +					wake_up(&stream->wq_stopped);
>> +					continue;
>> +				}
>> +
>> +				rkcif_stream_pingpong(stream);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
> 
> Now to the IOMMU page faults:
> 
> Camera Sensor: IMX219
> Frame Size: 1920x1080
> Format: SRGGB10P
> 
> Packed SRGGB10
> --> Every four consecutive samples are packed into 5 bytes
> --> Stride = 2400 bytes (1920 * 5/4)
> 
> So the imagesize = 1080 * 2400 = 2 592 000
> 
> in __vb2_buf_mem_alloc() the size of the buf will be PAGE_ALIGNED in:
> PAGE_ALIGN(vb->planes[plane].length);
> 
> So we allocate a buffer with the size: 2 592 768 -> hex = 0x297000
> 
> In rkcif_mipi_queue_buffer():
> We will queue a total of two buffers to the HW (2 because of pingpong)
> The first buffer will have the address: 0x00000000ffc00000
> 
> We start to capture and then this happens:
> 
> rk_iommu fdfe0800.iommu: Page fault at 0x00000000ffe79000 of type write
> rk_iommu fdfe0800.iommu: iova = 0x00000000ffe79000: dte_index: 0x3ff pte_index: 0x279 page_offset: 0x0
> rk_iommu fdfe0800.iommu: mmu_dte_addr: 0x0000000012cc8000 dte@...000000012cc8ffc: 0x11a0d001 valid: 1 pte@...000000011a0d9e4: 0x31b79006 valid: 0 page@...000000000000000 flags: 0x0
> 
> With:
> 0xffe79000 = 0xffc00000 (buffer address) + 0x297000 (buffersize)
> 
> --> So the VICAP is overflowing the buffer even though everything was
> correctly configured ?! (If I understood everything correctly ofc.)

I could reproduce this behavior and found that the (hardcoded) virtual
line width needs to be adjusted accordingly. It was set to width * 2,
and it needs to be set to width * 10 / 8.

> I also see the same problem with the SRGGB8 format. It also happens in
> the downstream Radxa/Rockchip Kernel.

Strange that the downstream kernel has issues with that. Anyway, this
shouldn't be the issue here...

> Do you see the same problem ?

... but I could reproduce this behavior as well and trace it back to the
same root cause. Here, we need width * 1, of course.

I'll integrate the fix in v12, please stay tuned!

Best regards,
Michael


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ