lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7egn6azfxckepxadqwqg6s7lsu4ycm4lhchn2ijx7zydcseifw@jvfuvy4vz44h>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 23:24:10 +0000
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, 
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] KVM: selftests: Remove invalid CR3 test from
 vmx_tsc_adjust_test

On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 03:55:32PM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 8:02 AM Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
> >
> > Checking that VMLAUNCH fails with an invalid CR3 is irrelevant to this
> > test. Remove it to simplify the test a little bit before generalizing it
> > to cover SVM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
> 
> Is there value in moving the invalid CR3 test elsewhere, rather than
> just eliminating it?

It's a very basic test, but yeah we can keep it. I was doing the lazy
thing by just dropping it to see if anyone will comment.

I will find a new home for it (or keep it here out of more laziness).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ