[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41283b3e-cf11-4faf-879d-0078bb24e6a0@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 11:31:47 +0530
From: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jianyun Gao <jianyungao89@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched: Fix some spelling mistakes in the scheduler
module
Hi Jianyun,
On 09/10/25 08:16, Jianyun Gao wrote:
> From: "jianyun.gao" <jianyungao89@...il.com>
>
> The following are some spelling mistakes existing in the scheduler
> module. Just fix it!
>
> slection -> selection
> achitectures -> architectures
> excempt -> exempt
> incorectly -> incorrectly
> litle -> little
> faireness -> fairness
> condtion -> condition
>
> Signed-off-by: jianyun.gao <jianyungao89@...il.com>
> ---
> v3:
> Change "except" to "exempt" in v2.
It should be "excempt" to "exempt"
> The previous version is here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250929061213.1659258-1-jianyungao89@gmail.com/
>
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/cputime.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 ++++----
> kernel/sched/wait_bit.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7f1e5cb94c53..af5076e40567 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6858,7 +6858,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(int sched_mode)
> /*
> * We pass task_is_blocked() as the should_block arg
> * in order to keep mutex-blocked tasks on the runqueue
> - * for slection with proxy-exec (without proxy-exec
> + * for selection with proxy-exec (without proxy-exec
> * task_is_blocked() will always be false).
> */
> try_to_block_task(rq, prev, &prev_state,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index 7097de2c8cda..2429be5a5e40 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr, struct prev_cputime *prev,
> stime = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(stime, rtime, stime + utime);
> /*
> * Because mul_u64_u64_div_u64() can approximate on some
> - * achitectures; enforce the constraint that: a*b/(b+c) <= a.
> + * architectures; enforce the constraint that: a*b/(b+c) <= a.
> */
> if (unlikely(stime > rtime))
> stime = rtime;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 18a30ae35441..b1c335719f49 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5381,7 +5381,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> bool delay = sleep;
> /*
> * DELAY_DEQUEUE relies on spurious wakeups, special task
> - * states must not suffer spurious wakeups, excempt them.
> + * states must not suffer spurious wakeups, exempt them.
> */
> if (flags & (DEQUEUE_SPECIAL | DEQUEUE_THROTTLE))
> delay = false;
> @@ -5842,7 +5842,7 @@ static bool enqueue_throttled_task(struct task_struct *p)
> * target cfs_rq's limbo list.
> *
> * Do not do that when @p is current because the following race can
> - * cause @p's group_node to be incorectly re-insterted in its rq's
> + * cause @p's group_node to be incorrectly re-insterted in its rq's
s/re-insterted/re-inserted/
Thanks,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy
> * cfs_tasks list, despite being throttled:
> *
> * cpuX cpuY
> @@ -12161,7 +12161,7 @@ static inline bool update_newidle_cost(struct sched_domain *sd, u64 cost)
> * sched_balance_newidle() bumps the cost whenever newidle
> * balance fails, and we don't want things to grow out of
> * control. Use the sysctl_sched_migration_cost as the upper
> - * limit, plus a litle extra to avoid off by ones.
> + * limit, plus a little extra to avoid off by ones.
> */
> sd->max_newidle_lb_cost =
> min(cost, sysctl_sched_migration_cost + 200);
> @@ -13176,7 +13176,7 @@ static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se)
> * If a task gets attached to this cfs_rq and before being queued,
> * it gets migrated to another CPU due to reasons like affinity
> * change, make sure this cfs_rq stays on leaf cfs_rq list to have
> - * that removed load decayed or it can cause faireness problem.
> + * that removed load decayed or it can cause fairness problem.
> */
> if (!cfs_rq_pelt_clock_throttled(cfs_rq))
> list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait_bit.c b/kernel/sched/wait_bit.c
> index 1088d3b7012c..47ab3bcd2ebc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/wait_bit.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/wait_bit.c
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_wait_var_entry);
> * given variable to change. wait_var_event() can be waiting for an
> * arbitrary condition to be true and associates that condition with an
> * address. Calling wake_up_var() suggests that the condition has been
> - * made true, but does not strictly require the condtion to use the
> + * made true, but does not strictly require the condition to use the
> * address given.
> *
> * The wake-up is sent to tasks in a waitqueue selected by hash from a
Powered by blists - more mailing lists