[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aOdsqHznz1SJdadC@mail.hacktheplanet.fi>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 17:04:56 +0900
From: Lauri Tirkkonen <lauri@...ktheplanet.fi>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: patch Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x Keyboard rdesc
Hi Benjamin,
On Thu, Oct 09 2025 09:38:50 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c
> > index 63f46a2e5788..d78bd97ec24e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c
>
> Why patching i2c-hid-core when this is clearly a logical bug, not a
> transport (I2C) bug?
>
> I would rather see this fixup in hid-lenovo.c along with the other
> lenovo fixes.
I'm not exactly familiar with HID; please bear with me :) If
i2c-hid-core is not the correct place for this kind of thing, I can move
it, but I'm going to need some guidance on where the correct place is.
This device uses hid-over-i2c, not hid-lenovo; I've got
CONFIG_HID_LENOVO=m but the module is not even loaded. I don't see how
putting the fixup in a module that does not attach to the device could
work. So where should it go?
[ 796.926931] input: hid-over-i2c 048D:8987 Keyboard as /devices/platform/soc@...c0000.geniqup/b80000.i2c/i2c-1/1-003a/0018:048D:8987.000F/input/input36
As a side note: apparently there is at least one other device in
existence with a similar error in the report descriptor, which works
fine on Windows:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=652f3d00de523a17b0cebe7b90debccf13aa8c31
--
Lauri Tirkkonen | lotheac @ IRCnet
Powered by blists - more mailing lists