[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8796335-bec3-4c1f-afea-b5b7909d8ba3@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 19:27:15 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com, tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com,
trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com, yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,pas: Document pas for
Kaanapali SoCCP
On 25/09/2025 08:37, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> +
> + glink-edge:
> + $ref: /schemas/remoteproc/qcom,glink-edge.yaml#
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> + description: |
Drop |
> + Qualcomm G-Link subnode which represents communication edge, channels
> + and devices related to the Remoteproc.
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - memory-region
> + - clocks
> + - clock-names
> + - interrupts
> + - interrupt-names
> + - qcom,smem-states
> + - qcom,smem-state-names
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
That's wrong in this context. But if you add missing (and corrected
pas-common) then it would make sense.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists