[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d898a68-631c-4442-9a1c-237f672e296f@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 13:07:03 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/6] ASoC: soc: qcom: sc8280xp: add support for I2S
clocks
On 10/9/25 11:45 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 10/9/25 11:41, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 10/8/25 8:56 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> Add support for getting the I2S clocks used for the MI2S
>>> interfaces, and enable/disable the clocks on the PCM
>>> startup and shutdown card callbacks.
>>>
>>> The rate can be easily calculated since the card forces 48Hz,
>>> 2 channels at 16bit slot size.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +static int sc8280xp_snd_i2s_index(struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
>>> +{
>>> + switch (dai->id) {
>>> + case PRIMARY_MI2S_RX...PRIMARY_MI2S_TX:
>>
>> I have mixed feelings about the range syntax here.. it's only 2 entries
>> per and it's quite error-prone (no errors in this case, but it
>> encourages the thinking that things are always contiguous)..
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> switch (cpu_dai->id) {
>>> case PRIMARY_MI2S_RX...QUATERNARY_MI2S_TX:
>>> case QUINARY_MI2S_RX...QUINARY_MI2S_TX:
>>
>> whereas e.g. here we see that it's not really the case, but it's
>> tempting for someone trying to 'clean up' the code to change it to:
>>
>> case PRIMARY_MI2S_RX...QUINARY_MI2S_TX
>>
>> and the reviewers may not catch it
>
> I understand your point, but I just took what was already in the file...
>
> Is my change correct, yes, is the style of the code improvable, yes.
>
> I'll do my best to fix the style issue later on.
That works, thanks
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists