[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP_m5ovLLxpzyexq0vhVV8JPXAYcbzUqrQmn7jZkdhfmNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 13:18:15 +0200
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
Cc: xiubli@...hat.com, amarkuze@...hat.com, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net/ceph/messenger: add empty check to ceph_con_get_out_msg()
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 11:49 AM Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com> wrote:
>
> This moves the list_empty() checks from the two callers (v1 and v2)
> into the base messenger.c library. Now the v1/v2 specializations do
> not need to know about con->out_queue; that implementation detail is
> now hidden behind the ceph_con_get_out_msg() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
> ---
> net/ceph/messenger.c | 4 +++-
> net/ceph/messenger_v1.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> net/ceph/messenger_v2.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> index 424fb2769b71..8886c38a55d2 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> @@ -2113,7 +2113,9 @@ struct ceph_msg *ceph_con_get_out_msg(struct ceph_connection *con)
> {
> struct ceph_msg *msg;
>
> - BUG_ON(list_empty(&con->out_queue));
> + if (list_empty(&con->out_queue))
> + return NULL;
> +
> msg = list_first_entry(&con->out_queue, struct ceph_msg, list_head);
> WARN_ON(msg->con != con);
>
> diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c b/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c
> index 516f2eeb122a..5eb6cfdbc494 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c
> @@ -189,12 +189,18 @@ static void prepare_write_message_footer(struct ceph_connection *con, struct cep
>
> /*
> * Prepare headers for the next outgoing message.
> + *
> + * @return false if there are no outgoing messages
> */
> -static void prepare_write_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
> +static bool prepare_write_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
> {
> struct ceph_msg *m;
> u32 crc;
>
> + m = ceph_con_get_out_msg(con);
> + if (m == NULL)
> + return false;
> +
> con_out_kvec_reset(con);
> con->v1.out_msg_done = false;
>
> @@ -208,8 +214,6 @@ static void prepare_write_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
> &con->v1.out_temp_ack);
> }
>
> - m = ceph_con_get_out_msg(con);
> -
> dout("prepare_write_message %p seq %lld type %d len %d+%d+%zd\n",
> m, con->out_seq, le16_to_cpu(m->hdr.type),
> le32_to_cpu(m->hdr.front_len), le32_to_cpu(m->hdr.middle_len),
> @@ -256,6 +260,8 @@ static void prepare_write_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
> }
>
> ceph_con_flag_set(con, CEPH_CON_F_WRITE_PENDING);
> +
> + return true;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1543,8 +1549,7 @@ int ceph_con_v1_try_write(struct ceph_connection *con)
> goto more;
> }
> /* is anything else pending? */
> - if (!list_empty(&con->out_queue)) {
> - prepare_write_message(con);
> + if (prepare_write_message(con)) {
Hi Max,
I made a change to net/ceph/messenger_v1.c hunks of this patch to
follow what is done for msgr2 where ceph_con_get_out_msg() is called
outside of the prepare helper and the new message is passed in.
prepare_write_message() doesn't need to return a bool anymore.
Let me know if you see something wrong there:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client/commit/6140f1d43ba9425dc55b12bdfd8877b0c5118d9a
Thanks,
Ilya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists