lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc942235-bf65-4841-bc1c-b3c66b39498a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 10:21:14 -0400
From: David Hunter <david.hunter.linux@...il.com>
To: Ahmet Eray Karadag <eraykrdg1@...il.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
 syzbot+f3185be57d7e8dda32b8@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
 Albin Babu Varghese <albinbabuvarghese20@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix: ext4: add sanity check for inode inline write range

On 10/8/25 09:40, Ahmet Eray Karadag wrote:
> I’ll review things more carefully before sending any follow-ups.

Hey,

I wanted to make some suggestions for you to do before sending a patch.
I recommend using tools like ftrace and the old classic printf
statements to verify that the code is doing what you are saying that the
code is doing.

If you are having trouble with the less intrusive tools, you can use
kgdb to verify your own code does what is expected, but do not use it as
a final verification because it is too intrusive and changes overall
kernel behavior.

Let me know if you are having any problems or need help with something.

Thanks,
David Hunter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ