[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <429400d3-e369-cf6a-3e9c-3d00622d7f29@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 14:48:10 +0530
From: Harikrishna shenoy <h-shenoy@...com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
CC: <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <rfoss@...nel.org>,
<Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, <jonas@...boo.se>,
<jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
<mripard@...nel.org>, <tzimmermann@...e.de>, <airlied@...il.com>,
<simona@...ll.ch>, <lumag@...nel.org>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
<andy.yan@...k-chips.com>, <mordan@...ras.ru>, <linux@...blig.org>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <aradhya.bhatia@...ux.dev>,
<javierm@...hat.com>, <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devarsht@...com>, <u-kumar1@...com>, <s-jain1@...com>,
<lyude@...hat.com>, <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Set the
mhdp connector earlier in atomic_enable()
On 06/10/25 04:42, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 02:09:33PM +0530, Harikrishna Shenoy wrote:
>> From: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
>>
>> In case if we get errors in cdns_mhdp_link_up() or cdns_mhdp_reg_read()
>> in atomic_enable, we will go to cdns_mhdp_modeset_retry_fn() and will hit
>> NULL pointer while trying to access the mutex. We need the connector to
>> be set before that. Unlike in legacy !(DBANC) cases, we do not have
>> connector initialised in bridge_attach(). Now that we have the connector
>> pointer in mhdp bridge structure, so set the mhdp->connector in
>> atomic_enable() earlier to avoid possible NULL pointer dereference
>> in recovery paths like modeset_retry_fn() with the DBANC flag set.
>>
>> Fixes: c932ced6b585 ("drm/tidss: Update encoder/bridge chain connect model")
>
> This Fixes tag means that this patch can be attempted to be backported
> back to v6.5 (even w/o cc:stable, etc). I know that it is a pain, but
> please move all Fixes to the top of the series. Yes, you want to drop
> non-DBANC case first and then fix everything. It doesn't look like it is
> a correct approach for the sake of maintaing the -stable branches.
>
Hi Dmitry,
The patch which drops non-DBANC case can be moved after fixes, but for
making fixes i need the pointer structure so adding fixes tag to PATCH
2/6 "drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546*: Change
drm_connector from structure to pointer"
Let me know your thoughts on this, will re-spin accordingly.
Regards.
>> Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Harikrishna Shenoy <h-shenoy@...com>
>> ---
>> .../drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c | 20 +++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists