[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ecr9upfd.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 23:57:42 +0300
From: Sergey Organov <sorganov@...il.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>, Angelo Dureghello
<angelo@...nel-space.org>
Subject: Re: ARM iMX6sx board fails to boot with kernel 6.17
Hi Fabio,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> writes:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 11:59 AM Sergey Organov <sorganov@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, sent resulting u-boot image off-list.
>
> It still boots for me. Please see the log below. I tested several boots.
>
> My board is a very old one, with i.MX6SX version 1.0.
>
> Looking at the commit you mentioned:
>
> https://github.com/nxp-imx/linux-imx/commit/816978f83b1d8dd6ce3bd5dd62223dbfdf74bdd3
>
> It does add an 'if (imx_get_soc_revision() >= IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_2) '
> check, so maybe this cpuidle fix is silicon version dependent?
>
> Such a commit is huge. Could you add only the code under the above
> 'if' logic to see if it works in mainline?
I'm not familiar with the code and can't figure what exactly I'm
expected to check. Could you please prepare a patch, and I'll be happy
to apply and check it.
> CPU: Freescale i.MX6SX rev1.0 996 MHz (running at 792 MHz)
> CPU: Extended Commercial temperature grade (-20C to 105C) at 39C
I have:
CPU: Freescale i.MX6SX rev1.3 at 792MHz
CPU: Automotive temperature grade (-40C to 125C) at 55C
-- Sergey Organov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists