linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] driver: gpio-bt8xx: use generic PCI PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202510110924.dUQeeRV6-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 09:43:54 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com>, Michael Buesch <m@...s.ch>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver: gpio-bt8xx: use generic PCI PM

Hi Vaibhav,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on brgl/gpio/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.17 next-20251010]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vaibhav-Gupta/driver-gpio-bt8xx-use-generic-PCI-PM/20251010-185625
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git gpio/for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251010105338.664564-1-vaibhavgupta40%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v1] driver: gpio-bt8xx: use generic PCI PM
config: loongarch-randconfig-002-20251011 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251011/202510110924.dUQeeRV6-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251011/202510110924.dUQeeRV6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510110924.dUQeeRV6-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c: In function 'bt8xxgpio_suspend':
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c:233:19: error: 'struct bt8xxgpio' has no member named 'saved_outen'
     233 |                 bg->saved_outen = bgread(BT848_GPIO_OUT_EN);
         |                   ^~
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c:234:19: error: 'struct bt8xxgpio' has no member named 'saved_data'
     234 |                 bg->saved_data = bgread(BT848_GPIO_DATA);
         |                   ^~
   drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c: In function 'bt8xxgpio_resume':
   drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c:254:19: error: 'struct bt8xxgpio' has no member named 'saved_outen'
     254 |         bgwrite(bg->saved_outen, BT848_GPIO_OUT_EN);
         |                   ^~
   drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c:61:41: note: in definition of macro 'bgwrite'
      61 | #define bgwrite(dat, adr)       writel((dat), bg->mmio+(adr))
         |                                         ^~~
   drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c:255:19: error: 'struct bt8xxgpio' has no member named 'saved_data'
     255 |         bgwrite(bg->saved_data & bg->saved_outen,
         |                   ^~
   drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c:61:41: note: in definition of macro 'bgwrite'
      61 | #define bgwrite(dat, adr)       writel((dat), bg->mmio+(adr))
         |                                         ^~~
   drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c:255:36: error: 'struct bt8xxgpio' has no member named 'saved_outen'
     255 |         bgwrite(bg->saved_data & bg->saved_outen,
         |                                    ^~
   drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c:61:41: note: in definition of macro 'bgwrite'
      61 | #define bgwrite(dat, adr)       writel((dat), bg->mmio+(adr))
         |                                         ^~~


vim +233 drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c

ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  226  
2213c7a2cb81b2 drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c Vaibhav Gupta       2025-10-10  227  static int __maybe_unused bt8xxgpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  228  {
2213c7a2cb81b2 drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c Vaibhav Gupta       2025-10-10  229  	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  230  	struct bt8xxgpio *bg = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  231  
b9a557d05a7dde drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c Bartosz Golaszewski 2025-03-10  232  	scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &bg->lock) {
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25 @233  		bg->saved_outen = bgread(BT848_GPIO_OUT_EN);
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25 @234  		bg->saved_data = bgread(BT848_GPIO_DATA);
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  235  
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  236  		bgwrite(0, BT848_INT_MASK);
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  237  		bgwrite(~0x0, BT848_INT_STAT);
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  238  		bgwrite(0x0, BT848_GPIO_OUT_EN);
b9a557d05a7dde drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c Bartosz Golaszewski 2025-03-10  239  	}
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  240  
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  241  	return 0;
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  242  }
ff1d5c2f0268f4 drivers/gpio/bt8xxgpio.c  Michael Buesch      2008-07-25  243  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki