[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <984fddea-2085-4820-871b-40d69feb11c8@web.de>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 18:44:48 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Dixit Parmar <dixitparmar19@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá
<nuno.sa@...log.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ti-ads131e08: return correct error code
…
> This change makes …
Will another imperative wording approach become more helpful for an improved
change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17#n94
How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17#n145
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists