linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] extcon: Fixed extcon duplicate issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c39d3a3d-0476-47f1-93f6-7d26b5793ee5@web.de>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 19:06:10 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Michael Wu <michael@...winnertech.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
 Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extcon: Fixed extcon duplicate issue

> extcon_dev_ids may re-alloc to another while this device unregister not complete
…

Will another imperative wording approach become more helpful for an improved
change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17#n94

How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17#n145

Regards,
Markus