lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e83f343-7da1-3235-d681-0d5b8816d1b9@loongson.cn>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 12:07:58 +0800
From: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
To: gaosong <gaosong@...ngson.cn>, chenhuacai@...nel.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, kernel@...0n.name,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] LoongArch: KVM: Add AVEC support



On 2025/10/13 上午11:18, gaosong wrote:
> 在 2025/10/11 上午9:29, Bibo Mao 写道:
>>
>>
>> On 2025/10/10 下午2:48, Song Gao wrote:
>>> Add cpu_has_msgint() to check whether the host cpu supported avec,
>>> and restore/save CSR_MSGIS0-CSR_MSGIS3.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@...ngson.cn>
>>> ---
>>> Based-on: 
>>> https://patchew.org/linux/20250930093741.2734974-1-maobibo@loongson.cn/
>>> v2: fix build error.
>> It is not necessary based on this patch, you can base it on master 
>> branch. The later merged patch need based on previous version in general.
>>
> Got it.
>>>
>>>   arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  4 ++++
>>>   arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h |  1 +
>>>   arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  1 +
>>>   arch/loongarch/kvm/interrupt.c        |  3 +++
>>>   arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c             | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
>>>   arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c               |  4 ++++
>>>   6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h 
>>> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> index 392480c9b958..446f1104d59d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -285,6 +285,10 @@ static inline bool kvm_guest_has_lbt(struct 
>>> kvm_vcpu_arch *arch)
>>>       return arch->cpucfg[2] & (CPUCFG2_X86BT | CPUCFG2_ARMBT | 
>>> CPUCFG2_MIPSBT);
>>>   }
>>>   +static inline bool cpu_has_msgint(void)
>>> +{
>>> +    return read_cpucfg(LOONGARCH_CPUCFG1) & CPUCFG1_MSGINT;
>>> +}
>>>   static inline bool kvm_guest_has_pmu(struct kvm_vcpu_arch *arch)
>>>   {
>>>       return arch->cpucfg[6] & CPUCFG6_PMP;
>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h 
>>> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h
>>> index f1efd7cfbc20..3784ab4ccdb5 100644
>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h
>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>>   #define CPU_PMU                (_ULCAST_(1) << 10)
>>>   #define CPU_TIMER            (_ULCAST_(1) << 11)
>>>   #define CPU_IPI                (_ULCAST_(1) << 12)
>>> +#define CPU_AVEC                        (_ULCAST_(1) << 14)
>>>     /* Controlled by 0x52 guest exception VIP aligned to estat bit 
>>> 5~12 */
>>>   #define CPU_IP0                (_ULCAST_(1))
>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h 
>>> b/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> index 57ba1a563bb1..de6c3f18e40a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct kvm_fpu {
>>>   #define  KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_PV_IPI        6
>>>   #define  KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_PV_STEALTIME    7
>>>   #define  KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_PTW        8
>>> +#define  KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_MSGINT        9
>>>     /* Device Control API on vcpu fd */
>>>   #define KVM_LOONGARCH_VCPU_CPUCFG    0
>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/interrupt.c 
>>> b/arch/loongarch/kvm/interrupt.c
>>> index 8462083f0301..adc278fb3cb9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/interrupt.c
>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/interrupt.c
>>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ static unsigned int 
>>> priority_to_irq[EXCCODE_INT_NUM] = {
>>>       [INT_HWI5]    = CPU_IP5,
>>>       [INT_HWI6]    = CPU_IP6,
>>>       [INT_HWI7]    = CPU_IP7,
>>> +    [INT_AVEC]    = CPU_AVEC,
>>>   };
>>>     static int kvm_irq_deliver(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int 
>>> priority)
>>> @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ static int kvm_irq_deliver(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
>>> unsigned int priority)
>>>       case INT_IPI:
>>>       case INT_SWI0:
>>>       case INT_SWI1:
>>> +    case INT_AVEC:
>>>           set_gcsr_estat(irq);
>> Do we need cpu_has_msgint() here ? It is impossible that VMM inject 
>> INT_AVEC interrrupt on non-msgint machine such as 3C5000.
>>
> yes we need , how about this?
> 
> @@ -31,6 +32,11 @@ static int kvm_irq_deliver(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> unsigned int priority)
>          if (priority < EXCCODE_INT_NUM)
>                  irq = priority_to_irq[priority];
> 
> +        if (cpu_has_msgint() && (priority == INT_AVEC)) {
> +                set_gcsr_estat(irq);
> +                return 1;
> +        }
> +
>          switch (priority) {
>          case INT_TI:
>          case INT_IPI:
This is workable. Another way is to add checking in irq inject root 
source function kvm_vcpu_ioctl_interrupt(). Both works for me.

BTW, I think that there should be modification with function 
kvm_deliver_intr() also. max irq bit is *INT_IPI + 1* where there will 
be problem with INT_AVEC. Should it be modified as *EXCCODE_INT_NUM*?

void kvm_deliver_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
         unsigned int priority;
         unsigned long *pending = &vcpu->arch.irq_pending;
         unsigned long *pending_clr = &vcpu->arch.irq_clear;

         for_each_set_bit(priority, pending_clr, INT_IPI + 1)
                 kvm_irq_clear(vcpu, priority);

         for_each_set_bit(priority, pending, INT_IPI + 1)
                 kvm_irq_deliver(vcpu, priority);
}

Regards
Bibo Mao
> 
> Thanks.
> Song Gao
> 
> 
>>>           break;
>>>   @@ -63,6 +65,7 @@ static int kvm_irq_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
>>> unsigned int priority)
>>>       case INT_IPI:
>>>       case INT_SWI0:
>>>       case INT_SWI1:
>>> +    case INT_AVEC:
>>>           clear_gcsr_estat(irq);
>> Ditto.
>>
>> The others look good to me.
>>
>> Regards
>> Bibo Mao
>>>           break;
>>>   diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
>>> index 30e3b089a596..226c735155be 100644
>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
>>> @@ -657,8 +657,7 @@ static int _kvm_get_cpucfg_mask(int id, u64 *v)
>>>           *v = GENMASK(31, 0);
>>>           return 0;
>>>       case LOONGARCH_CPUCFG1:
>>> -        /* CPUCFG1_MSGINT is not supported by KVM */
>>> -        *v = GENMASK(25, 0);
>>> +        *v = GENMASK(26, 0);
>>>           return 0;
>>>       case LOONGARCH_CPUCFG2:
>>>           /* CPUCFG2 features unconditionally supported by KVM */
>>> @@ -726,6 +725,10 @@ static int kvm_check_cpucfg(int id, u64 val)
>>>           return -EINVAL;
>>>         switch (id) {
>>> +    case LOONGARCH_CPUCFG1:
>>> +        if ((val & CPUCFG1_MSGINT) && (!cpu_has_msgint()))
>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>>> +        return 0;
>>>       case LOONGARCH_CPUCFG2:
>>>           if (!(val & CPUCFG2_LLFTP))
>>>               /* Guests must have a constant timer */
>>> @@ -1658,6 +1661,12 @@ static int _kvm_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu 
>>> *vcpu, int cpu)
>>>       kvm_restore_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_DMWIN2);
>>>       kvm_restore_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_DMWIN3);
>>>       kvm_restore_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_LLBCTL);
>>> +    if (cpu_has_msgint()) {
>>> +        kvm_restore_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR0);
>>> +        kvm_restore_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR1);
>>> +        kvm_restore_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR2);
>>> +        kvm_restore_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR3);
>>> +    }
>>>         /* Restore Root.GINTC from unused Guest.GINTC register */
>>>       write_csr_gintc(csr->csrs[LOONGARCH_CSR_GINTC]);
>>> @@ -1747,6 +1756,12 @@ static int _kvm_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu 
>>> *vcpu, int cpu)
>>>       kvm_save_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_DMWIN1);
>>>       kvm_save_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_DMWIN2);
>>>       kvm_save_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_DMWIN3);
>>> +    if (cpu_has_msgint()) {
>>> +        kvm_save_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR0);
>>> +        kvm_save_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR1);
>>> +        kvm_save_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR2);
>>> +        kvm_save_hw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ISR3);
>>> +    }
>>>         vcpu->arch.aux_inuse |= KVM_LARCH_SWCSR_LATEST;
>>>   diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
>>> index d8c813e2d72e..438885b6f2b1 100644
>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
>>> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ static void kvm_vm_init_features(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>           kvm->arch.support_features |= 
>>> BIT(KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_PV_STEALTIME);
>>>       }
>>>   +    if (cpu_has_msgint())
>>> +        kvm->arch.support_features |= 
>>> BIT(KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_MSGINT);
>>> +
>>>       val = read_csr_gcfg();
>>>       if (val & CSR_GCFG_GPMP)
>>>           kvm->arch.support_features |= BIT(KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_PMU);
>>> @@ -153,6 +156,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_feature_has_attr(struct kvm 
>>> *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr
>>>       case KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_PMU:
>>>       case KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_PV_IPI:
>>>       case KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_PV_STEALTIME:
>>> +        case KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_MSGINT:
>>>           if (kvm_vm_support(&kvm->arch, attr->attr))
>>>               return 0;
>>>           return -ENXIO;
>>>
>>
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ