[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <faead017-128f-4d63-9552-82b536ea7612@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 14:16:27 -0700
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <chao.gao@...el.com>,
<abusse@...zon.de>, <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] x86/microcode/intel: Establish staging control
logic
On 10/13/2025 6:42 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Fixups ontop:
Thanks!
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> index daae74858347..216595a45564 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> @@ -315,15 +315,18 @@ static void stage_microcode(void)
> int cpu, err;
> u64 mmio_pa;
>
> - if (!IS_ALIGNED(get_totalsize(&ucode_patch_late->hdr), sizeof(u32)))
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(get_totalsize(&ucode_patch_late->hdr), sizeof(u32))) {
> + pr_err("Microcode image 32-bit misaligned (0x%x), staging failed.\n",
> + get_totalsize(&ucode_patch_late->hdr));
> return;
> + }
Yeah, need to keep in mind more consistent about emitting error messages
in this area.
Include the updated patch:
View attachment "PATCH6a-x86-microcode-intel-Establish-staging-control-logic.patch" of type "text/plain" (3852 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists