[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39e66166-32a1-43db-8d80-143fa288a71b@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:36:45 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Jun Guo <Jun.Guo@...tech.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] arm64: dts: xilinx: add soc-specific spi
compatibles for zynqmp/versal-net
On 10/2/25 11:44, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 08:06:47AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 10/1/25 20:31, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/versal-net.dtsi | 4 ++--
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi | 4 ++--
>>
>> Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
>>
>> Do you expect to go via SPI tree or via SOC tree?
>
> Via SOC would be preferred, there's no functional change and I don't
> think the dtbs_check warnings are worth doing something abnormal, as
> long as what's in linux-next is clean.
2/2 applied to Xilinx SOC tree.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists