[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32a23856-ffaa-4d41-b77f-fa0306042621@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 10:10:59 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+8259e1d0e3ae8ed0c490@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Network Development
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>, ziy@...dia.com,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING: locking bug in __set_page_owner (2)
On 10/10/25 03:02, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 5:41 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> Seems 6.18 will need this. Do you think it is needed in earlier kernel
>> versions?
>
> Maybe. I need to study the git history of that code to see
> whether it's a new path or I simply missed it earlier.
I would add the following, which means 6.15. Maybe there were no users
immediately that would trigger it, but should be proper. The only non-EOL
stable is 6.17 anyway, but might help others backporting.
Fixes: 97769a53f117 ("mm, bpf: Introduce try_alloc_pages() for opportunistic
page allocation")
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists