[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44a87cd90f09c442a2967944d4b0e498@disroot.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:24:20 +0000
From: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: exynos7870: relocate ${x}-names property
after ${x}
On 2025-10-07 01:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/09/2025 19:01, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote:
>> On 2025-09-28 21:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Sept 2025 at 01:44, Kaustabh Chakraborty
>>> <kauschluss@...root.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All ${x}-names properties are conventionally placed after their
>>>> corresponding ${x} properties. For instance, 'clock-names' must
>>>> follow
>>>> 'clocks', 'interrupt-names' must follow 'interrupts'. Make necessary
>>>> changes to follow said convention. No functional changes made.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't intend to take such cosmetic changes, because they interfere
>>> with stable back porting, unless we have a tool for such cleanup. Did
>>> you use my prototype tool for that or some other tool?
>>
>> No, I did it manually. This is due to your first remark in [1] and
>> my corresponding reply in [2]. What do I do here then?
>
>
> I asked for the new code to follow this style, but I don't want to fix
> yet existing code - before we come with a tool doing it.
Well it would stay inconsistent until then – fine, I'll drop these.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists