[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251013-fix_netpoll_aa-v1-1-94a1091f92f0@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 02:42:29 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, gustavold@...il.com, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Subject: [PATCH net] netpoll: Fix deadlock caused by memory allocation
under spinlock
Fix a AA deadlock in refill_skbs() where memory allocation while holding
skb_pool->lock can trigger a recursive lock acquisition attempt.
The deadlock scenario occurs when the system is under severe memory
pressure:
1. refill_skbs() acquires skb_pool->lock (spinlock)
2. alloc_skb() is called while holding the lock
3. Memory allocator fails and calls slab_out_of_memory()
4. This triggers printk() for the OOM warning
5. The console output path calls netpoll_send_udp()
6. netpoll_send_udp() attempts to acquire the same skb_pool->lock
7. Deadlock: the lock is already held by the same CPU
Call stack:
refill_skbs()
spin_lock_irqsave(&skb_pool->lock) <- lock acquired
__alloc_skb()
kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof()
slab_out_of_memory()
printk()
console_flush_all()
netpoll_send_udp()
skb_dequeue()
spin_lock_irqsave() <- deadlock attempt
Refactor refill_skbs() to never allocate memory while holding
the spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f41 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
---
net/core/netpoll.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index 60a05d3b7c249..788cec4d527f8 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -232,14 +232,26 @@ static void refill_skbs(struct netpoll *np)
skb_pool = &np->skb_pool;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&skb_pool->lock, flags);
- while (skb_pool->qlen < MAX_SKBS) {
+ while (1) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&skb_pool->lock, flags);
+ if (skb_pool->qlen >= MAX_SKBS)
+ goto unlock;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&skb_pool->lock, flags);
+
skb = alloc_skb(MAX_SKB_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!skb)
- break;
+ return;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&skb_pool->lock, flags);
+ if (skb_pool->qlen >= MAX_SKBS)
+ /* Discard if len got increased (TOCTOU) */
+ goto discard;
__skb_queue_tail(skb_pool, skb);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&skb_pool->lock, flags);
}
+discard:
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&skb_pool->lock, flags);
}
---
base-commit: 0b4b77eff5f8cd9be062783a1c1e198d46d0a753
change-id: 20251013-fix_netpoll_aa-c991ac5f2138
Best regards,
--
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists