[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH5fLgi4C454xG67vN-T5rRV1X4-rAGEj_ftnHqTOoN61wtcKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 11:45:39 +0200
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Ben Guo <benx.guo@...il.com>
Cc: si.yanteng@...ux.dev, a.hindborg@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com,
alexs@...nel.org, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
corbet@....net, dakr@...nel.org, dzm91@...t.edu.cn, gary@...yguo.net,
hust-os-kernel-patches@...glegroups.com, justinstitt@...gle.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
lossin@...nel.org, morbo@...gle.com, nathan@...nel.org,
nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tmgross@...ch.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs/zh_CN: Add translation of rust/testing.rst
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 6:38 AM Ben Guo <benx.guo@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Yanteng,
>
> I’d like to confirm the expected use of the In-Reply-To header for versioned patches.
>
> In my case:
> [PATCH] -> Message-ID: <20250929163531.376092-1-benx.guo@...il.com>
> [PATCH v2] -> Message-ID: <20251003074939.465517-1-benx.guo@...il.com>
> [PATCH v2] -> In-Reply-To: <20250929163531.376092-1-benx.guo@...il.com>
>
> That means the v2 patch points back to the v1 message ID.
>
> Could you please confirm whether I should start a new thread for [PATCH v2], or if there’s something wrong with how I used the In-Reply-To header?
> Thanks for helping clarify this.
When posting a new version, you should start a new thread.
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists