lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bab3249a-d9f2-4f19-9493-b7560aecc3ce@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 11:54:00 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
 osalvador@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, broonie@...nel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hugetlbfs: check for shareable lock before calling
 huge_pmd_unshare()

On 13.10.25 11:33, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> That makes a lot of sense - moving the assertions after the early return
> checks is cleaner since the locks are only needed when actual unsharing
> work happens.
> 
> Should I send a v5 with your suggested change?

Let's wait if the hugetlb maintainers have any preference.

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ