[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bab3249a-d9f2-4f19-9493-b7560aecc3ce@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 11:54:00 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
osalvador@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, broonie@...nel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hugetlbfs: check for shareable lock before calling
huge_pmd_unshare()
On 13.10.25 11:33, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> That makes a lot of sense - moving the assertions after the early return
> checks is cleaner since the locks are only needed when actual unsharing
> work happens.
>
> Should I send a v5 with your suggested change?
Let's wait if the hugetlb maintainers have any preference.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists