linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 kvm-x86/gmem 1/2] KVM: guest_memfd: move kvm_gmem_get_index() and use in kvm_gmem_prepare

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aO5P8TMihUZZaYX-@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 06:28:17 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Shivank Garg <shivankg@....com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, david@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 kvm-x86/gmem 1/2] KVM: guest_memfd: move
 kvm_gmem_get_index() and use in kvm_gmem_prepare_folio()

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025, Shivank Garg wrote:
> On 10/13/2025 11:46 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> I see you've already merged these changes into kvm-x86/gmem.

Yep.  I need to do testing (not really of these patches, but of other things I've
applied), and then you'll see the "official" thank you mails.

> Should I resend these patches with kvm-x86/next and --base, or is the current
> version sufficient?

Current version is sufficient, thanks!