lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuV-J7N0cAy30X+rLCRrER071nMkk9JC6kjDw1U0gEzJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:38:01 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, 
	achill@...ill.org, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, 
	Ben Copeland <benjamin.copeland@...aro.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, 
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/262] 6.12.53-rc1 review

On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 at 16:56, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 at 20:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.53 release.
> > There are 262 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:42:41 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.53-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> The S390 defconfig builds failed on the Linux stable-rc 6.12.53-rc1
> and 6.6.112-rc1 tag build due to following build warnings / errors
> with gcc and clang toolchains.
>
> Also seen on 6.6.112-rc1.
>
> * s390, build
>   - clang-21-defconfig
>   - clang-nightly-defconfig
>   - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
>   - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
>   - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
>   - gcc-14-allmodconfig
>   - gcc-14-defconfig
>   - gcc-14-lkftconfig-hardening
>   - gcc-8-defconfig-fe40093d
>   - gcc-8-lkftconfig-hardening
>   - korg-clang-21-lkftconfig-hardening
>   - korg-clang-21-lkftconfig-lto-full
>   - korg-clang-21-lkftconfig-lto-thing
>
> First seen on 6.12.53-rc1
> Good: v6.12.52
> Bad: 6.12.53-rc1 also seen on 6.6.112-rc1
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? yes
> - Reproducibility? yes
>
> Build regressions: arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1813:49: error:
> 'struct bpf_jit' has no member named 'frame_off'
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> # Build error
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'bpf_jit_insn':
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1813:49: error: 'struct bpf_jit' has no
> member named 'frame_off'
>  1813 |                         _EMIT6(0xd203f000 | (jit->frame_off +
>       |                                                 ^~
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:211:55: note: in definition of macro '_EMIT6'
>   211 |                 *(u32 *) (jit->prg_buf + jit->prg) = (op1);     \
>       |                                                       ^~~
> include/linux/stddef.h:16:33: error: invalid use of undefined type
> 'struct prog_frame'
>    16 | #define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)  __builtin_offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)
>       |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:211:55: note: in definition of macro '_EMIT6'
>   211 |                 *(u32 *) (jit->prg_buf + jit->prg) = (op1);     \
>       |                                                       ^~~
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1814:46: note: in expansion of macro 'offsetof'
>  1814 |                                              offsetof(struct prog_frame,
>       |                                              ^~~~~~~~
> include/linux/stddef.h:16:33: error: invalid use of undefined type
> 'struct prog_frame'
>    16 | #define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)  __builtin_offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)
>       |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:212:59: note: in definition of macro '_EMIT6'
>   212 |                 *(u16 *) (jit->prg_buf + jit->prg + 4) = (op2); \
>       |                                                           ^~~
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1816:41: note: in expansion of macro 'offsetof'
>  1816 |                                0xf000 | offsetof(struct prog_frame,
>       |                                         ^~~~~~~~
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function '__arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline':
> include/linux/stddef.h:16:33: error: invalid use of undefined type
> 'struct prog_frame'
>    16 | #define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)  __builtin_offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)
>       |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:212:59: note: in definition of macro '_EMIT6'
>   212 |                 *(u16 *) (jit->prg_buf + jit->prg + 4) = (op2); \
>       |                                                           ^~~
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2813:33: note: in expansion of macro 'offsetof'
>  2813 |                        0xf000 | offsetof(struct prog_frame,
> tail_call_cnt));
>       |                                 ^~~~~~~~
> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.o] Error 1
>
> The git blame is pointing to,
>  $ git blame -L 1813  arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>    162513d7d81487 (Ilya Leoshkevich)    _EMIT6(0xd203f000 | (jit->frame_off +
>
> Commit pointing to,
>    s390/bpf: Write back tail call counter for BPF_PSEUDO_CALL
>    [ Upstream commit c861a6b147137d10b5ff88a2c492ba376cd1b8b0 ]

Anders bisected reported regressions and also suggested the missing patches.

Ilya Leoshkevich,
Is it a good idea to backport / cherry pick these two patches on the
6.12 branch ?

b2268d550d20 ("s390/bpf: Centralize frame offset calculations")
e26d523edf2a ("s390/bpf: Describe the frame using a struct instead of
constants")


> ## Build
> * kernel: 6.12.53-rc1
> * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> * git commit: 7e50c0945b4ab1d4019f9905f6cf5350082c6a84
> * git describe: v6.12.52-263-g7e50c0945b4a
> * test details:
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.12.y/build/v6.12.52-263-g7e50c0945b4a
>
> ## Test Regressions (compared to v6.12.50-47-gf7ad21173a19)
> * s390, build
>   - clang-21-defconfig
>   - clang-nightly-defconfig
>   - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
>   - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
>   - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
>   - gcc-14-allmodconfig
>   - gcc-14-defconfig
>   - gcc-14-lkftconfig-hardening
>   - gcc-8-defconfig-fe40093d
>   - gcc-8-lkftconfig-hardening
>   - korg-clang-21-lkftconfig-hardening
>   - korg-clang-21-lkftconfig-lto-full
>   - korg-clang-21-lkftconfig-lto-thing

- Naresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ