lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aO5inFRpD_aVxtxD@p14s>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 08:47:56 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ux.dev>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, set_pte_at@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] rpmsg: char: Reuse eptdev logic for anonymous
 device

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 11:15:29PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote:
> Current uAPI implementation for rpmsg ctrl & char device manipulation is
> abstracted in procedures below:
> - fd = open("/dev/rpmsg_ctrlX")
> - ioctl(fd, RPMSG_CREATE_EPT_IOCTL, &info); /dev/rpmsgY devnode is
>   generated.
> - fd_ep = open("/dev/rpmsgY", O_RDWR)
> - operations on fd_ep(write, read, poll ioctl)
> - ioctl(fd_ep, RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL)
> - close(fd_ep)
> - close(fd)
> 
> This /dev/rpmsgY abstraction is less favorable for:
> - Performance issue: It's time consuming for some operations are involved:
>   - Device node creation.
>     Depends on specific config, especially CONFIG_DEVTMPFS, the overall
>     overhead is based on coordination between DEVTMPFS and userspace
>     tools such as udev and mdev.
> 
>   - Extra kernel-space switch cost.
> 
>   - Other major costs brought by heavy-weight logic like device_add().
> 
> - /dev/rpmsgY node can be opened only once. It doesn't make much sense
>     that a dynamically created device node can be opened only once.
> 
> - For some container application such as docker, a client can't access
>   host's device node unless specified explicitly. But in case of
>   /dev/rpmsgY, which is generated dynamically and whose existence is
>   unknown for clients in advance, this uAPI based on device node doesn't
>   fit well.
> 
> An anonymous inode based approach is introduced to address the issues above.

The above line is too long and gives me a checkpatch warning.  Please refactor
and send again.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> Rather than generating device node and opening it, rpmsg code just creates
> an anonymous inode representing eptdev and return the fd to userspace.
> 
> The legacy abstraction based on struct dev and struct cdev is honored
> for:
> - Avoid legacy uAPI break(RPMSG_CREATE_EPT_IOCTL)
> - Reuse existing logic:
>   -- dev_err() and friends.
>   -- Life cycle management of struct device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ux.dev>
> ---
>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> index eec7642d2686..6c19f2146698 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data)
>  	/* wake up any blocked readers */
>  	wake_up_interruptible(&eptdev->readq);
>  
> -	cdev_device_del(&eptdev->cdev, &eptdev->dev);
> +	if (eptdev->dev.devt)
> +		cdev_device_del(&eptdev->cdev, &eptdev->dev);
>  	put_device(&eptdev->dev);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -132,21 +133,17 @@ static int rpmsg_ept_flow_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *priv, bool enable
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int rpmsg_eptdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +static int __rpmsg_eptdev_open(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev)
>  {
> -	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = cdev_to_eptdev(inode->i_cdev);
>  	struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept;
>  	struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = eptdev->rpdev;
>  	struct device *dev = &eptdev->dev;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
>  	if (eptdev->ept) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!eptdev->rpdev) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
>  		return -ENETRESET;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -164,21 +161,32 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>  	if (!ept) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed to open %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
>  		put_device(dev);
> -		mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>  	ept->flow_cb = rpmsg_ept_flow_cb;
>  	eptdev->ept = ept;
> -	filp->private_data = eptdev;
> -	mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int rpmsg_eptdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +static int rpmsg_eptdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>  {
>  	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = cdev_to_eptdev(inode->i_cdev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
> +	ret = __rpmsg_eptdev_open(eptdev);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		filp->private_data = eptdev;
> +	mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_eptdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> +	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = filp->private_data;
>  	struct device *dev = &eptdev->dev;
>  
>  	/* Close the endpoint, if it's not already destroyed by the parent */
> @@ -400,12 +408,13 @@ static void rpmsg_eptdev_release_device(struct device *dev)
>  	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = dev_to_eptdev(dev);
>  
>  	ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
> -	ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(eptdev->dev.devt));
> +	if (eptdev->dev.devt)
> +		ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(eptdev->dev.devt));
>  	kfree(eptdev);
>  }
>  
> -static struct rpmsg_eptdev *rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_alloc(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> -						      struct device *parent)
> +static struct rpmsg_eptdev *rpmsg_eptdev_alloc(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> +					       struct device *parent, bool cdev)
>  {
>  	struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
>  	struct device *dev;
> @@ -428,33 +437,50 @@ static struct rpmsg_eptdev *rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_alloc(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev
>  	dev->groups = rpmsg_eptdev_groups;
>  	dev_set_drvdata(dev, eptdev);
>  
> -	cdev_init(&eptdev->cdev, &rpmsg_eptdev_fops);
> -	eptdev->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +	if (cdev) {
> +		cdev_init(&eptdev->cdev, &rpmsg_eptdev_fops);
> +		eptdev->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +	}
>  
>  	return eptdev;
>  }
>  
> -static int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev, struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
> +static struct rpmsg_eptdev *rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_alloc(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> +						      struct device *parent)
> +{
> +	return rpmsg_eptdev_alloc(rpdev, parent, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
> +			    struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo, bool cdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &eptdev->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	eptdev->chinfo = chinfo;
>  
> -	ret = ida_alloc_max(&rpmsg_minor_ida, RPMSG_DEV_MAX - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto free_eptdev;
> -	dev->devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(rpmsg_major), ret);
> +	if (cdev) {
> +		ret = ida_alloc_max(&rpmsg_minor_ida, RPMSG_DEV_MAX - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto free_eptdev;
>  
> +		dev->devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(rpmsg_major), ret);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Anonymous inode device still need device name for dev_err() and friends */
>  	ret = ida_alloc(&rpmsg_ept_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto free_minor_ida;
>  	dev->id = ret;
>  	dev_set_name(dev, "rpmsg%d", ret);
>  
> -	ret = cdev_device_add(&eptdev->cdev, &eptdev->dev);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto free_ept_ida;
> +	ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (cdev) {
> +		ret = cdev_device_add(&eptdev->cdev, &eptdev->dev);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto free_ept_ida;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* We can now rely on the release function for cleanup */
>  	dev->release = rpmsg_eptdev_release_device;
> @@ -464,7 +490,8 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev, struct rpmsg_cha
>  free_ept_ida:
>  	ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
>  free_minor_ida:
> -	ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
> +	if (cdev)
> +		ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
>  free_eptdev:
>  	put_device(dev);
>  	kfree(eptdev);
> @@ -472,6 +499,11 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev, struct rpmsg_cha
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev, struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
> +{
> +	return rpmsg_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo, true);
> +}
> +
>  int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent,
>  			       struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ