linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net v6 0/5] net: macb: various fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <DDI5O7901X78.1VI8B7669OVP8@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:38:10 +0200
From: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
To: "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Théo Lebrun
 <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Paolo Abeni"
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Nicolas Ferre"
 <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, "Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
 "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, "Harini Katakam"
 <harini.katakam@...inx.com>, "Richard Cochran" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Thomas
 Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, "Tawfik Bayouk"
 <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
 <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, "Sean Anderson" <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 0/5] net: macb: various fixes

On Fri Sep 26, 2025 at 10:40 PM CEST, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 09:56:25 +0200 Théo Lebrun wrote:
>> What's the state of maintainers minds for this series? It has been
>> stable for some time, tested on sam9x75 (by Nicolas Ferre) & EyeQ5
>> and Simon Horman has added his reviewed-by this morning (thanks!).
>> But of course I am biased.
>
> We'll get to it.. having the revisions a few days apart rather than 
> a few weeks apart helps maintainers remember the details, and generally
> leads to lower wait times. FWIW.

ACK! I'll make sure to stay on track for the next ones. It hadn't
occurred to me that maintainers do forget, which sounds dumb once
written out loud.

Thanks Jakub,

--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com