[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7197bfc7-fef6-40b2-b3f3-182e9428dc12@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:02 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Tao Ren <rentao.bupt@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tao Ren <taoren@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] ARM: dts: aspeed: facebook-fuji: Include
facebook-fuji-data64.dts
On 10/14/25 08:11, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> If it is already in mainline, i don't care too much if it is wrong. We
>>> don't want to cause regressions.
>>>
>>> I only object when adding new nodes which are wrong. If we keep adding
>>> broken nodes, there is no incentive to fix the broken driver to do the
>>
>> This wasn't adding an allegedly (sorry, it worked for me) broken node,
>> it was removing one that worked for me all along. Obviously I do not know
>> if it worked (or if it is even used) on real hardware, but it worked for
>> the fuji-bmc qemu emulation.
>
> It probably does work on real hardware, because it is one of those
> "two wrongs makes a right" cases. So i see this as a regression. The
> node should not be removed. It should hopefully get corrected sometime
> in the future when somebody actually fixes the aspeed driver, and
> fixes both wrongs.
So you are trying to force the issue by disabling the Ethernet interface
on fuji-bmc until the problem in the driver (whatever it is) has been fixed ?
That just seems odd.
Never mind, this is not my hardware. I just used it for testing, after all.
Again, I already dropped network interface testing on that emulation,
so for me the issue is closed.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists