linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: net: dsa: nxp,sja1105: Add optional clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251014120213.002308f2@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 12:02:13 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vladimir
 Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring
 <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS"
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE
 TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: net: dsa: nxp,sja1105: Add optional
 clock

On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:12:23 +0100 Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 07:02:50PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 02:34:17PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:  
> > > Add optional clock for OSC_IN and fix the below CHECK_DTBS warnings:
> > >   arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qp-prtwd3.dtb: switch@0 (nxp,sja1105q): Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('clocks' was unexpected)
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>  
> > 
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > pw-bot: not-applicable  
> 
> Hmm, I think this pw-bot command, intended for the dt patchwork has
> probably screwed with the state in the netdev patchwork. Hopefully I can
> fix that via

The pw-bot commands are a netdev+bpf thing :) They won't do anything
to dt patchwork. IOW the pw-bot is a different bot than the one that
replies when patch is applied.