linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] samples/bpf: Fix spelling typo in samples/bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251014140035.31bd9154@shazbot.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 14:00:35 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex@...zbot.org>
To: Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@...pur.com>
Cc: <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
 <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <eddyz87@...il.com>, <song@...nel.org>,
 <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
 <kpsingh@...nel.org>, <sdf@...ichev.me>, <haoluo@...gle.com>,
 <jolsa@...nel.org>, <kwankhede@...dia.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] samples/bpf: Fix spelling typo in samples/bpf

On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 14:08:49 +0800
Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@...pur.com> wrote:

> do_hbm_test.sh:
> The comment incorrectly used "upcomming" instead of "upcoming".
> 
> hbm.c
> The comment incorrectly used "Managment" instead of "Management".
> The comment incorrectly used "Currrently" instead of "Currently".
> 
> tcp_cong_kern.c
> The comment incorrectly used "deteremined" instead of "determined".
> 
> tracex1.bpf.c
> The comment incorrectly used "loobpack" instead of "loopback".
> 
> mtty.c
> The comment incorrectly used "atleast" instead of "at least".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@...pur.com>
> ---
>  samples/bpf/do_hbm_test.sh  | 2 +-
>  samples/bpf/hbm.c           | 4 ++--
>  samples/bpf/tcp_cong_kern.c | 2 +-
>  samples/bpf/tracex1.bpf.c   | 2 +-
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c    | 2 +-
>  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
...
> diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
> index 59eefe2fed10..6cb3e5974990 100644
> --- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
> +++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
> @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static void handle_bar_read(unsigned int index, struct mdev_state *mdev_state,
>  		u8 lsr = 0;
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&mdev_state->rxtx_lock);
> -		/* atleast one char in FIFO */
> +		/* at least one char in FIFO */
>  		if (mdev_state->s[index].rxtx.head !=
>  				 mdev_state->s[index].rxtx.tail)
>  			lsr |= UART_LSR_DR;

I'd suggest this go through bpf since it touches more there.  For mtty,

Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex@...zbot.org>