[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a0d9a427b36d4bcff992dfb8694436cd24d6af3.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 08:55:44 +0200
From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rv: Add explicit lockdep context for reactors
On Tue, 2025-10-14 at 07:51 +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Reactors can be called from any context through tracepoints.
> When developing reactors care needs to be taken to only call APIs which
> are safe. As the tracepoints used during testing may not actually be
> called from restrictive contexts lockdep may not be helpful.
>
> Add explicit overrides to help lockdep find invalid code patterns.
>
> The usage of LD_WAIT_FREE will trigger lockdep warnings in the panic
> reactor. These are indeed valid warnings but they are out of scope for
> RV and will instead be fixed by the printk subsystem.
Looks like a nice addition!
If I get it correctly, this patch does trigger a lockdep warning with the
current state of the kernel. Is there a plan of fixing the warning in printk?
I assume this series would need to wait for that or did you have other ideas?
Thanks,
Gabriele
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c b/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c
> index
> 8c02426bc3bd944265f809e431283d1a20d56a8c..d9d335ae9badaa320f1d35dd159a033c3a30
> eb1a 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
> * printk
> */
>
> +#include <linux/lockdep.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #include "rv.h"
> @@ -480,6 +481,7 @@ int init_rv_reactors(struct dentry *root_dir)
>
> void rv_react(struct rv_monitor *monitor, const char *msg, ...)
> {
> + static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(rv_react_map, LD_WAIT_FREE);
> va_list args;
>
> if (!rv_reacting_on() || !monitor->react)
> @@ -487,7 +489,9 @@ void rv_react(struct rv_monitor *monitor, const char *msg,
> ...)
>
> va_start(args, msg);
>
> + lock_map_acquire_try(&rv_react_map);
> monitor->react(msg, args);
> + lock_map_release(&rv_react_map);
>
> va_end(args);
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists