linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: net: disable kswapd for high-order network buffer allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89i+j_CZM9Q=xTkSq-7cjeRkt29JikD3WqvmPihDrUHBQEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:01:07 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: corbet@....net, davem@...emloft.net, hannes@...xchg.org, horms@...nel.org, 
	jackmanb@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, kuniyu@...gle.com, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linyunsheng@...wei.com, mhocko@...e.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, surenb@...gle.com, v-songbaohua@...o.com, vbabka@...e.cz, 
	willemb@...gle.com, zhouhuacai@...o.com, ziy@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: net: disable kswapd for high-order network buffer allocation

On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 11:43 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > A problem with the existing sysctl is that it only covers the TX path;
> > > for the RX path, we also observe that kswapd consumes significant power.
> > > I could add the patch below to make it support the RX path, but it feels
> > > like a bit of a layer violation, since the RX path code resides in mm
> > > and is intended to serve generic users rather than networking, even
> > > though the current callers are primarily network-related.
> >
> > You might have a buggy driver.
>
> We are observing the RX path as follows:
>
> do_softirq
>     taskset_hi_action
>        kalPacketAlloc
>            __netdev_alloc_skb
>                page_frag_alloc_align
>                    __page_frag_cache_refill
>
> This appears to be a fairly common stack.
>
> So it is a buggy driver?

No idea, kalPacketAlloc is not in upstream trees.

It apparently needs high order allocations. It will fail at some point.

>
> >
> > High performance drivers use order-0 allocations only.
> >
>
> Do you have an example of high-performance drivers that use only order-0 memory?

About all drivers using XDP, and/or using napi_get_frags()

XDP has been using order-0 pages from the very beginning.