[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aO4N0Up_g8JvJj9x@hyeyoo>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:46:09 +0900
From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: fix clearing freelist in free_deferred_objects()
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 10:44:51AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/14/25 10:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > defer_free() links pending objects using the slab's freelist offset
> > which is fine as they are not free yet. free_deferred_objects() then
> > clears this pointer to avoid confusing the debugging consistency checks
> > that may be enabled for the cache.
> >
> > However, with CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED, even the NULL pointer needs
> > to be encoded appropriately using set_freepointer(), otherwise it's
> > decoded as something else and triggers the consistency checks, as found
> > by the kernel test robot.
> >
> > Use set_freepointer() to prevent the issue.
> >
> > Fixes: af92793e52c3 ("slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock().")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202510101652.7921fdc6-lkp@intel.com
> > Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> > ---
> > will be added to slab/for-next-fixes and sent later this week
> > ---
> > mm/slub.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index b1f15598fbfd..64c17afc375b 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -6443,15 +6443,16 @@ static void free_deferred_objects(struct irq_work *work)
> > slab = virt_to_slab(x);
> > s = slab->slab_cache;
> >
> > +
>
> extra newline moved...
>
> > + /* Point 'x' back to the beginning of allocated object */
> > + x -= s->offset;
>
> ... here. noticed and fixed up locally after sending...
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Thanks for fixing it!
> > /*
> > * We used freepointer in 'x' to link 'x' into df->objects.
> > * Clear it to NULL to avoid false positive detection
> > * of "Freepointer corruption".
> > */
> > - *(void **)x = NULL;
> > + set_freepointer(s, x, NULL);
> >
> > - /* Point 'x' back to the beginning of allocated object */
> > - x -= s->offset;
> > __slab_free(s, slab, x, x, 1, _THIS_IP_);
> > }
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists