linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 03/13] dt-bindings: power: supply: BD72720 managed battery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdb-Oz4RXWjLEH2ffKhe3jRxVTSN1u5g=tTTfQHpXW1=8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 12:29:10 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, 
	Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/13] dt-bindings: power: supply: BD72720 managed battery

On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 3:00 PM Matti Vaittinen
<mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:

> >> +  rohm,volt-drop-very-low-temp-microvolt:
> >> +    description: VDR table for very low temperature
> >
> > Doesn't the four last properties require to be defined as uint32-array?
>
> I have been under impression that the "-microvolt" ending suffices, but
> I may be wrong. At last the 'make dt_binding_check' didn't give me a shout.

Ah you're right, I tend to forget about all the magic Rob has put into
dtsschema.

> >> +        rohm,voltage-vdr-thresh-microvolt = <4150000>;
> >
> > This property seems to be missing from the bindings?
>
> I think it is the first binding in the file :)

Ugh I missed it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij