linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/13] filelock: add a lm_may_setlease lease

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a320441f2b568c71649a7e6e99381b1dba6a8e.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 07:10:18 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Alexander Viro
 <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,  Christian Brauner	 <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan
 Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Chuck Lever	 <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, Alexander Aring
 <alex.aring@...il.com>, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...nel.org>, Anna
 Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>, Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,  Paulo
 Alcantara	 <pc@...guebit.org>, Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@...il.com>,
 Shyam Prasad N	 <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
 Bharath SM	 <bharathsm@...rosoft.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,  "Rafael J. Wysocki"	 <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, David Howells	 <dhowells@...hat.com>,
 Tyler Hicks <code@...icks.com>, Olga Kornievskaia	 <okorniev@...hat.com>,
 Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, Amir Goldstein	 <amir73il@...il.com>, Namjae
 Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>, Steve French	 <smfrench@...il.com>, Sergey
 Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>,
 Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller"	
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski	
 <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman	
 <horms@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, 	samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
 netfs@...ts.linux.dev, ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] filelock: add a lm_may_setlease lease_manager
 callback

On Tue, 2025-10-14 at 16:34 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > The NFSv4.1 protocol adds support for directory delegations, but it
> > specifies that if you already have a delegation and try to request a new
> > one on the same filehandle, the server must reply that the delegation is
> > unavailable.
> > 
> > Add a new lease manager callback to allow the lease manager (nfsd in
> > this case) to impose this extra check when performing a setlease.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/locks.c               |  5 +++++
> >  include/linux/filelock.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> > index 0b16921fb52e602ea2e0c3de39d9d772af98ba7d..9e366b13674538dbf482ffdeee92fc717733ee20 100644
> > --- a/fs/locks.c
> > +++ b/fs/locks.c
> > @@ -1826,6 +1826,11 @@ generic_add_lease(struct file *filp, int arg, struct file_lease **flp, void **pr
> >  			continue;
> >  		}
> >  
> > +		/* Allow the lease manager to veto the setlease */
> > +		if (lease->fl_lmops->lm_may_setlease &&
> > +		    !lease->fl_lmops->lm_may_setlease(lease, fl))
> > +			goto out;
> > +
> 
> I don't see any locking around this.  What if the condition which
> triggers a veto happens after this check, and before the lm_change
> below?
> Should lm_change implement the veto?  Return -EAGAIN?
> 
> 

The flc_lock is held over this check and any subsequent lease addition.
Is that not sufficient?

> >  		/*
> >  		 * No exclusive leases if someone else has a lease on
> >  		 * this file:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/filelock.h b/include/linux/filelock.h
> > index c2ce8ba05d068b451ecf8f513b7e532819a29944..70079beddf61aa32ef01f1114cf0cb3ffaf2131a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/filelock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/filelock.h
> > @@ -49,6 +49,20 @@ struct lease_manager_operations {
> >  	int (*lm_change)(struct file_lease *, int, struct list_head *);
> >  	void (*lm_setup)(struct file_lease *, void **);
> >  	bool (*lm_breaker_owns_lease)(struct file_lease *);
> > +
> > +	/**
> > +	 * lm_may_setlease - extra conditions for setlease
> > +	 * @new: new file_lease being set
> > +	 * @old: old (extant) file_lease
> > +	 *
> > +	 * This allows the lease manager to add extra conditions when
> > +	 * setting a lease, based on the presence of an existing lease.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * Return values:
> > +	 *   %false: @new and @old conflict
> > +	 *   %true: No conflict detected
> > +	 */
> > +	bool (*lm_may_setlease)(struct file_lease *new, struct file_lease *old);
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct lock_manager {
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.51.0
> > 
> > 

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>