[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251014112640.261770-5-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:26:40 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: ast@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
jakub@...udflare.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org,
jiang.biao@...ux.dev,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf: use bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu_rcu() in bpf_prog_run_clear_cb
All the calling of bpf_prog_run_clear_cb() is protected with
rcu_read_lock, so we can replace bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() with
bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu_rcu() for it.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@...natelecom.cn>
---
include/linux/filter.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 48eb42358543..5ec5b16538f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static inline u32 bpf_prog_run_clear_cb(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
if (unlikely(prog->cb_access))
memset(cb_data, 0, BPF_SKB_CB_LEN);
- res = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, skb);
+ res = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu_rcu(prog, skb);
return res;
}
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists