[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06b0c6fb-0123-4482-ac07-80f0faec3532@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:11:51 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Hao Ge <hao.ge@...ux.dev>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Shakeel Butt
<shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hao Ge <gehao@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] slab: clear OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL when freeing a slab
On 10/15/25 14:59, Hao Ge wrote:
> From: Hao Ge <gehao@...inos.cn>
>
> If obj_exts allocation failed, slab->obj_exts is set to OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL,
> But we did not clear it when freeing the slab. Since OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL and
> MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS currently share the same bit position, during the
> release of the associated folio, a VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO() check in
> folio_memcg_kmem() is triggered because it was mistakenly assumed that
> a valid folio->memcg_data was not cleared before freeing the folio.
>
> When freeing a slab, we clear slab->obj_exts if the obj_ext array has been
> successfully allocated. So let's clear OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL when freeing
> a slab if the obj_ext array allocated fail to allow them to be returned
> to the buddy system more smoothly.
Thanks!
> Fixes: 7612833192d5 ("slab: Reuse first bit for OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL")
> Suggested-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@...inos.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
Since we changed the approach completely, I think we should not carry over
the previously added review tags in this case.
> ---
> v4: Based on the discussion between Vlastimil and Harry,
> modify the solution to clear OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL when freeing a slab.
> This does seem more reasonable. Thank you both.
> ---
> mm/slab.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/slub.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 078daecc7cf5..52424d6871bd 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -547,6 +547,28 @@ static inline struct slabobj_ext *slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
> return (struct slabobj_ext *)(obj_exts & ~OBJEXTS_FLAGS_MASK);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * objexts_clear_alloc_fail - Clear the OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL for
> + * the slab object extension vector associated with a slab.
> + * @slab: a pointer to the slab struct
> + */
> +static inline void objexts_clear_alloc_fail(struct slab *slab)
> +{
> + unsigned long obj_exts = READ_ONCE(slab->obj_exts);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> + /*
> + * obj_exts should be either NULL, a valid pointer with
> + * MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS bit set or be equal to OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL.
> + */
> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(obj_exts && !(obj_exts & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS) &&
> + obj_exts != OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL, slab_page(slab));
> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(obj_exts & MEMCG_DATA_KMEM, slab_page(slab));
> +#endif
> +
> + obj_exts &= ~OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL;
> + WRITE_ONCE(slab->obj_exts, obj_exts);
> +}
This is much larger than necessary I think. See below.
> int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
> gfp_t gfp, bool new_slab);
>
> @@ -557,6 +579,10 @@ static inline struct slabobj_ext *slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline void objexts_clear_alloc_fail(struct slab *slab)
> +{
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT */
>
> static inline enum node_stat_item cache_vmstat_idx(struct kmem_cache *s)
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index b1f15598fbfd..80166a4a62f9 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2169,6 +2169,12 @@ static inline void free_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
> {
> struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts;
>
> + /*
> + * If obj_exts allocation failed, slab->obj_exts is set to OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL,
> + * Therefore, we should clear the OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL flag first when freeing a slab.
> + */
> + objexts_clear_alloc_fail(slab);
> +
> obj_exts = slab_obj_exts(slab);
> if (!obj_exts)
> return;
It should be enough that this return path does "slab->obj_exts = 0;" no?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists