lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2344462.iZASKD2KPV@rafael.j.wysocki>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:52:41 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1] ACPI: battery: Drop redundant locking

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

All of the evaluations of objects in the ACPI namespace are carried out
under the namespace lock and interpreter lock in ACPICA, so it is not
necessary to put any additional locks around them for synchronization.

However, the ACPI battery driver does just that, so remove the
redundant locking around ACPI object evaluation from it.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/battery.c |   12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -91,7 +91,6 @@ enum {
 };
 
 struct acpi_battery {
-	struct mutex lock;
 	struct mutex update_lock;
 	struct power_supply *bat;
 	struct power_supply_desc bat_desc;
@@ -535,11 +534,9 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_info(struct
 		struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
 		acpi_status status = AE_ERROR;
 
-		mutex_lock(&battery->lock);
 		status = acpi_evaluate_object(battery->device->handle,
 					      use_bix ? "_BIX":"_BIF",
 					      NULL, &buffer);
-		mutex_unlock(&battery->lock);
 
 		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 			acpi_handle_info(battery->device->handle,
@@ -576,11 +573,8 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_state(struct
 			msecs_to_jiffies(cache_time)))
 		return 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&battery->lock);
 	status = acpi_evaluate_object(battery->device->handle, "_BST",
 				      NULL, &buffer);
-	mutex_unlock(&battery->lock);
-
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 		acpi_handle_info(battery->device->handle,
 				 "_BST evaluation failed: %s",
@@ -628,11 +622,8 @@ static int acpi_battery_set_alarm(struct
 	    !test_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_ALARM_PRESENT, &battery->flags))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	mutex_lock(&battery->lock);
 	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(battery->device->handle, "_BTP",
 					    battery->alarm);
-	mutex_unlock(&battery->lock);
-
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -1235,9 +1226,6 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_
 	strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_BATTERY_DEVICE_NAME);
 	strscpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_BATTERY_CLASS);
 	device->driver_data = battery;
-	result = devm_mutex_init(&device->dev, &battery->lock);
-	if (result)
-		return result;
 
 	result = devm_mutex_init(&device->dev, &battery->update_lock);
 	if (result)




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ