lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bCG011xf7v9nGMq4WQAUta9wDt05+W8KmRuc-JE7ZTwqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:19:08 -0400
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, brauner@...nel.org, corbet@....net, 
	graf@...zon.com, jgg@...pe.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, masahiroy@...nel.org, 
	ojeda@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, rppt@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, 
	jasonmiu@...gle.com, dmatlack@...gle.com, skhawaja@...gle.com, 
	glider@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] liveupdate: kho: allocate metadata directly from the
 buddy allocator

On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 9:05 AM Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> +Cc Marco, Alexander
>
> On Wed, Oct 15 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>
> > KHO allocates metadata for its preserved memory map using the SLUB
> > allocator via kzalloc(). This metadata is temporary and is used by the
> > next kernel during early boot to find preserved memory.
> >
> > A problem arises when KFENCE is enabled. kzalloc() calls can be
> > randomly intercepted by kfence_alloc(), which services the allocation
> > from a dedicated KFENCE memory pool. This pool is allocated early in
> > boot via memblock.
>
> At some point, we'd probably want to add support for preserving slab
> objects using KHO. That wouldn't work if the objects can land in scratch
> memory. Right now, the kfence pools are allocated right before KHO goes
> out of scratch-only and memblock frees pages to buddy.

If we do that, most likely we will add a GFP flag that goes with it,
so the slab can use a special pool of pages that are preservable.
Otherwise, we are going to be leaking memory from the old kernel in
the unpreserved parts of the pages. If we do that, kfence can ignore
allocations with that new preservable GFP flag.

Pasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ