linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/24] Hierarchical Constant Bandwidth Server

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251015151731.31191-1-yurand2000@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 17:17:31 +0200
From: Yuri Andriaccio <yurand2000@...il.com>
To: juri.lelli@...hat.com
Cc: bsegall@...gle.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it,
	mgorman@...e.de,
	mingo@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	vschneid@...hat.com,
	yuri.andriaccio@...tannapisa.it
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/24] Hierarchical Constant Bandwidth Server

Hi,

> I provided comments up to the last part of the series that implements
> migration. I will now stop on purpose and wait for replies/new versions of the
> patches I reviewed. I believe we could try to leave migration "for later"
> while we solidify the basics. What do you think?

Thanks a lot for your comments. It also makes sense to us to solidify the basics
before going on to the migration code and later updates. We have sent the
migration related patches just to show the end goal of this patchset and give
some intuition of possible use cases and demonstration on the provided
guarantees. We will work on your comments and submit a v4 patchset soon.

Have a nice day,
Yuri