[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH2r5msK3SDhAM0_monUcNTrf5JCwydD+AJgARaiVziUUo0WmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:29:46 -0500
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: Shuhao Fu <sfual@....ust.hk>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, Bharath SM <bharathsm@...rosoft.com>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.org>, Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@...il.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smb: Fix refcount leak for cifs_sb_tlink
I don't think the title needs to be changed, it seems clear enough.
The other changes are minor (changing goto label) and also probably
not needed but ok if you have to update it for other reasons.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:52 AM Shuhao Fu <sfual@....ust.hk> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 04:52:23PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > This patch fixes …
> >
> > * Will another imperative wording approach become more helpful for an improved
> > change description?
> > https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux.git%2Ftree%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-patches.rst%3Fh%3Dv6.17%23n94&data=05%7C02%7Csfual%40connect.ust.hk%7Caffcb410915f4b4bc8f308de0bfa853c%7C6c1d415239d044ca88d9b8d6ddca0708%7C1%7C0%7C638961367775911255%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=bThHSbvjokcDU6hNpnYxt4%2BlVyzlyxHl1JopGmCLY%2FQ%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > * Would it be more helpful to use the label “put_tlink” instead of “out”?
> >
> > * Can a subject like “smb: client: Complete reference counting in three functions”
> > be nicer?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Markus
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. My apologies for the inapproriate wording.
> Here's my updates. Please do let me know if it still needs improvement.
> I will definitely address these issues in patch v2.
>
> 1. An improved patch description
>
> Fix three refcount inconsistency issues related to `cifs_sb_tlink`.
>
> Comments for `cifs_sb_tlink` state that `cifs_put_tlink()` needs to be
> called after successful calls to `cifs_sb_tlink`. Three callsites fail
> to update refcount accordingly, leading to possible resource leaks.
>
> Fixes: 8ceb98437946 ("CIFS: Move rename to ops struct")
> Fixes: 2f1afe25997f ("cifs: Use smb 2 - 3 and cifsacl mount options getacl functions")
> Fixes: 366ed846df60 ("cifs: Use smb 2 - 3 and cifsacl mount options setacl function")
> Signed-off-by: Shuhao Fu <sfual@....ust.hk>
>
> 2. New subject: [PATCH v2] smb: client: Complete reference counting in three functions
>
> 3. Labels are changed accordingly
>
> @@ -3212,8 +3212,7 @@ get_smb2_acl_by_path(struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
> utf16_path = cifs_convert_path_to_utf16(path, cifs_sb);
> if (!utf16_path) {
> rc = -ENOMEM;
> - free_xid(xid);
> - return ERR_PTR(rc);
> + goto put_tlink;
> }
>
> oparms = (struct cifs_open_parms) {
> @@ -3245,6 +3244,7 @@ get_smb2_acl_by_path(struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
> SMB2_close(xid, tcon, fid.persistent_fid, fid.volatile_fid);
> }
>
> +put_tlink:
> cifs_put_tlink(tlink);
> free_xid(xid);
>
> @@ -3285,8 +3285,7 @@ set_smb2_acl(struct smb_ntsd *pnntsd, __u32 acllen,
> utf16_path = cifs_convert_path_to_utf16(path, cifs_sb);
> if (!utf16_path) {
> rc = -ENOMEM;
> - free_xid(xid);
> - return rc;
> + goto put_tlink;
> }
>
> oparms = (struct cifs_open_parms) {
> @@ -3307,6 +3306,7 @@ set_smb2_acl(struct smb_ntsd *pnntsd, __u32 acllen,
> SMB2_close(xid, tcon, fid.persistent_fid, fid.volatile_fid);
> }
>
> +put_tlink:
> cifs_put_tlink(tlink);
> free_xid(xid);
> return rc;
>
> Thanks,
> Shuhao
--
Thanks,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists