lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176054714162.709179.16748486101128898411.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:52:21 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Chang S. Bae" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
 "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
 Anselm Busse <abusse@...zon.de>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
 [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Establish staging control logic

The following commit has been merged into the x86/microcode branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     740144bc6bde9d44e3a6c224cee6fe971a08fbca
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/740144bc6bde9d44e3a6c224cee6fe971a08fbca
Author:        Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
AuthorDate:    Sun, 21 Sep 2025 15:48:37 -07:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
CommitterDate: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:47:20 +02:00

x86/microcode/intel: Establish staging control logic

When microcode staging is initiated, operations are carried out through
an MMIO interface. Each package has a unique interface specified by the
IA32_MCU_STAGING_MBOX_ADDR MSR, which maps to a set of 32-bit registers.

Prepare staging with the following steps:

  1.  Ensure the microcode image is 32-bit aligned to match the MMIO
      register size.

  2.  Identify each MMIO interface based on its per-package scope.

  3.  Invoke the staging function for each identified interface, which
      will be implemented separately.

  [ bp: Improve error logging. ]

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Tested-by: Anselm Busse <abusse@...zon.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/871pznq229.ffs@tglx
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h      |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
index 9e1720d..2b4560b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
@@ -1226,6 +1226,8 @@
 #define MSR_IA32_VMX_VMFUNC             0x00000491
 #define MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS3	0x00000492
 
+#define MSR_IA32_MCU_STAGING_MBOX_ADDR	0x000007a5
+
 /* Resctrl MSRs: */
 /* - Intel: */
 #define MSR_IA32_L3_QOS_CFG		0xc81
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 371ca6e..216595a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -299,6 +299,56 @@ static __init struct microcode_intel *scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
 	return size ? NULL : patch;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Handle the staging process using the mailbox MMIO interface.
+ * Return 0 on success or an error code on failure.
+ */
+static int do_stage(u64 mmio_pa)
+{
+	pr_debug_once("Staging implementation is pending.\n");
+	return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+}
+
+static void stage_microcode(void)
+{
+	unsigned int pkg_id = UINT_MAX;
+	int cpu, err;
+	u64 mmio_pa;
+
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(get_totalsize(&ucode_patch_late->hdr), sizeof(u32))) {
+		pr_err("Microcode image 32-bit misaligned (0x%x), staging failed.\n",
+			get_totalsize(&ucode_patch_late->hdr));
+		return;
+	}
+
+	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+
+	/*
+	 * The MMIO address is unique per package, and all the SMT
+	 * primary threads are online here. Find each MMIO space by
+	 * their package IDs to avoid duplicate staging.
+	 */
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_primary_thread_mask) {
+		if (topology_logical_package_id(cpu) == pkg_id)
+			continue;
+
+		pkg_id = topology_logical_package_id(cpu);
+
+		err = rdmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_MCU_STAGING_MBOX_ADDR, &mmio_pa);
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err))
+			return;
+
+		err = do_stage(mmio_pa);
+		if (err) {
+			pr_err("Error: staging failed (%d) for CPU%d at package %u.\n",
+			       err, cpu, pkg_id);
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+
+	pr_info("Staging of patch revision 0x%x succeeded.\n", ucode_patch_late->hdr.rev);
+}
+
 static enum ucode_state __apply_microcode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci,
 					  struct microcode_intel *mc,
 					  u32 *cur_rev)
@@ -627,6 +677,7 @@ static struct microcode_ops microcode_intel_ops = {
 	.collect_cpu_info	= collect_cpu_info,
 	.apply_microcode	= apply_microcode_late,
 	.finalize_late_load	= finalize_late_load,
+	.stage_microcode	= stage_microcode,
 	.use_nmi		= IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64),
 };
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ